Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG
A citizens’ anti-gambling initiative has been shot down by the State’s Attorney General
While the continuing state of Massachusetts is gearing up for rapid expansion of gambling in the state, not everybody has been excited about the move. That is why some anti-gambling activists there have produced a petition so that you can force a statewide vote on whether or not the casino jobs is able to maneuver ahead.
Those that are against the casinos that are new able to gather sufficient signatures to send the ballot question forward to the attorney general’s office. But regrettably for them, the continuing state solicitor however a stop to the move, saying that the ballot question wouldn’t be legal beneath the state’s ballot effort process.
Constitutional Provisions Preclude Ballot Question
The ballot initiative process is covered by Article 48 under the current state Constitution. That article not just describes the process for getting a relevant question in the ballot, but additionally establishes what can and can not be included in such questions. One of the rules for proposals states that they cannot hinder an entity’s ‘right to receive payment for personal property appropriated to public use’.
Based on state solicitor Peter Sacks, in the event that concern were to be approved by the public, thus ending the casino deals immediately, it could simply take the casino developers’ contract rights away without any settlement.